Antminer T19 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer T19 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| 84.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Power Consumption | 2,145 W |
| 37.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 8,550.0 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,319 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer T19
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Based on BTC price of $77,884 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer T19, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 155% more hashrate (84.0 vs 33.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer T19 and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer T19 155% more hashrate (84.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 32% better power draw (3,150 vs 2,145 W)
- Antminer T19 42% better efficiency (37.5 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- Antminer T19 100% better weight (14.4 vs 8,550.0 kg)
- Antminer T19 47% more heat output (10,748 vs 7,319 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T19 223% more home mining score (84.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer T19 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$4.55 | Daily net profit | -$3.97 |
| -$3,461 | Net after 1 year | -$3,947 |
| -$5,121 | Net after 2 years | -$5,395 |
| -$6,782 | Net after 3 years | -$6,842 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T19Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer T1937.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer T19 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 is more profitable at $-3.97/day compared to $-4.55/day for the Antminer T19. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer T19 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer T19 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer T19 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
The Antminer T19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer T19 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer T19 runs at 37.5 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 27.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficiency (37.5 vs 65.0 J/TH).