Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Hashrate 600.0 TH/s Power 8,700 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
VS
FluMiner T3

FluMiner T3

Hashrate 115.0 TH/s Power 1,700 W Efficiency 14.8 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs FluMiner T3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 Specification FluMiner T3
600.0 TH/s Hashrate 115.0 TH/s
8,700 W Power Consumption 1,700 W
14.5 J/TH Efficiency 14.8 J/TH
60 dB Noise Level 50 dB
Weight 12.6 kg
29,684 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 56/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer FluMiner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Daily Revenue 0.00027611 BTC $21.49
Daily Electricity -$20.88
Daily Profit $0.61
Monthly $18.29
Yearly $222.52

FluMiner T3

Daily Revenue 0.00005292 BTC $4.12
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit $0.04
Monthly $1.17
Yearly $14.18

Based on BTC price of $77,830 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Auradine Teraflux AH3880, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 422% more hashrate (600 vs 115 TH/s). The FluMiner T3 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AH3880 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and FluMiner T3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 422% more hashrate (600 vs 115 TH/s)
  • FluMiner T3 80% better power draw (8,700 vs 1,700 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 2% better efficiency (14.5 vs 14.8 J/TH)
  • FluMiner T3 17% better noise (60.0 vs 50.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 412% more heat output (29,684 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 Metric FluMiner T3
Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,601
$0.61 Daily net profit $0.04
+$223 Net after 1 year -$1,587
+$445 Net after 2 years -$1,572
+$668 Net after 3 years -$1,558
Payback period Takes ~112.9 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

$0.57/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

FluMiner T3

Score: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or FluMiner T3 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is more profitable at $0.61/day compared to $0.04/day for the FluMiner T3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or FluMiner T3?

The FluMiner T3 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or FluMiner T3?

The FluMiner T3 scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and FluMiner T3?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 0.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (14.5 vs 14.8 J/TH).