Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Hashrate 375.0 TH/s Power 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Bitaxe Gamma

Bitaxe Gamma

Hashrate 1,200.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitaxe Gamma

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Specification Bitaxe Gamma
375.0 TH/s Hashrate 1,200.0 GH/s
5,625 W Power Consumption 15 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level 38 dB
Weight 0.3 kg
19,193 BTU/hr BTU Output 51 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00017257 BTC $13.45
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$0.05
Monthly -$1.54
Yearly -$18.75

Bitaxe Gamma

Daily Revenue 0.00000055 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit $0.01
Monthly $0.21
Yearly $2.57

Based on BTC price of $77,932 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (5,625.0 vs 15.0 W). That said, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitaxe Gamma — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Bitaxe Gamma actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 31150% more hashrate (375.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 100% better power draw (5,625.0 vs 15.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 17% better efficiency (15.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 31% better noise (55.0 vs 38.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 37385% more heat output (19,192.5 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Metric Bitaxe Gamma
Upfront cost (MSRP) $99
-$0.05 Daily net profit $0.01
-$19 Net after 1 year -$96
-$38 Net after 2 years -$94
-$56 Net after 3 years -$91
Payback period Takes ~38.6 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe Gamma

$0.06/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Gamma

Score: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Gamma

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Bitaxe Gamma more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-0.05/day for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Bitaxe Gamma?

The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the Bitaxe Gamma?

The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (15.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).