Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1,200.0 GH/s |
| 5,625 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 38 dB |
| — | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Bitaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $77,932 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (5,625.0 vs 15.0 W). That said, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Bitaxe Gamma actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 31150% more hashrate (375.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 100% better power draw (5,625.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 17% better efficiency (15.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 31% better noise (55.0 vs 38.0 dB)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 37385% more heat output (19,192.5 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Metric | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$0.05 | Daily net profit | $0.01 |
| -$19 | Net after 1 year | -$96 |
| -$38 | Net after 2 years | -$94 |
| -$56 | Net after 3 years | -$91 |
| — | Payback period | Takes ~38.6 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitaxe Gamma$0.06/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Bitaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-0.05/day for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Bitaxe Gamma?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the Bitaxe Gamma?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (15.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17
