Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Whatsminer M63S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Specification | Whatsminer M63S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 450.0 TH/s |
| 4,420 W | Power Consumption | 7,650 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 17.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| — | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 15,081 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 26,102 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Whatsminer M63S+
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M63S+ wins on 3 of 4 factors (hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 73% more hashrate (260 vs 450 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M63S+'s favour. That said, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Whatsminer M63S+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M63S+ 73% more hashrate (260 vs 450 TH/s)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 42% better power draw (4,420 vs 7,650 W)
- Whatsminer M63S+ 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Whatsminer M63S+ 73% more heat output (15,081 vs 26,102 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Metric | Whatsminer M63S+ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $14,000 |
| -$1.15 | Daily net profit | -$1.99 |
| -$420 | Net after 1 year | -$14,726 |
| -$839 | Net after 2 years | -$15,453 |
| -$1,259 | Net after 3 years | -$16,179 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63S+Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
TieBoth miners have comparable efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Whatsminer M63S+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-1.15/day compared to $-1.99/day for the Whatsminer M63S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Whatsminer M63S+: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M63S+ is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Whatsminer M63S+?
The Whatsminer M63S+ scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Whatsminer M63S+?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S+ runs at 17.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Auradine Teraflux AT2880 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer S17