iPollo B1L vs Bitaxe Supra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | Bitaxe Supra |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 600.0 GH/s |
| 3,000 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
Bitaxe Supra
Based on BTC price of $77,866 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitaxe Supra wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 100% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 15.0 W) in the Bitaxe Supra's favour. The iPollo B1L holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo B1L and Bitaxe Supra diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo B1L 9567% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.6 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Supra 100% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Supra 52% better efficiency (51.7 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Supra 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 0.3 kg)
- iPollo B1L 19892% more heat output (10,236.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Supra 218% more home mining score (22.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | Bitaxe Supra |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $89 |
| -$5.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$2,299 | Net after 1 year | -$94 |
| -$4,169 | Net after 2 years | -$100 |
| -$6,038 | Net after 3 years | -$105 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe SupraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Supra25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo B1L or Bitaxe Supra more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Supra is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-5.12/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo B1L or Bitaxe Supra?
The Bitaxe Supra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iPollo B1L vs Bitaxe Supra: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Supra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo B1L and Bitaxe Supra on J/TH?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the Bitaxe Supra runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 26.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficiency (51.7 vs 25.0 J/TH).