iPollo B1L vs Whatsminer M63S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 390.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Power Consumption | 7,215 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | 28.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,618 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
Whatsminer M63S
Based on BTC price of $77,866 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M63S edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 572% more hashrate (58.0 vs 390.0 TH/s). The iPollo B1L claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo B1L and Whatsminer M63S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M63S 572% more hashrate (58.0 vs 390.0 TH/s)
- iPollo B1L 58% better power draw (3,000 vs 7,215 W)
- Whatsminer M63S 64% better efficiency (51.7 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63S 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 28.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M63S 141% more heat output (10,236 vs 24,618 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63S 100% more home mining score (22.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$5.12 | Daily net profit | -$3.34 |
| -$2,299 | Net after 1 year | -$13,220 |
| -$4,169 | Net after 2 years | -$14,439 |
| -$6,038 | Net after 3 years | -$15,659 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M63S18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo B1L vs Whatsminer M63S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M63S is more profitable at $-3.34/day compared to $-5.12/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo B1L or Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M63S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo B1L or Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M63S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo B1L vs Whatsminer M63S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 33.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficiency (51.7 vs 18.5 J/TH).