iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
IceRiver KS0
Based on BTC price of $77,015 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink BM-KS Max wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 10900% more hashrate (11.0 vs 0.1 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-KS Max and IceRiver KS0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 10900% more hashrate (11.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (3,400.0 vs 65.0 W)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 52% better efficiency (309 vs 650 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 80% better weight (12.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 5130% more heat output (11,601 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 97% more home mining score (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$7.77 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$4,635 | Net after 1 year | -$155 |
| -$7,471 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$10,307 | Net after 3 years | -$266 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.77/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS0?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-KS Max at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the IceRiver KS0?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-KS Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-KS Max and IceRiver KS0?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 340.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficiency (309 vs 650 J/TH).