iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Goldshell KA BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.2 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 339.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
Goldshell KA BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-KS Max edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 832% more hashrate (11.0 vs 1.2 TH/s). The Goldshell KA BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-KS Max and Goldshell KA BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 832% more hashrate (11.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 88% better power draw (3,400 vs 400 W)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 9% better efficiency (309 vs 339 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX 79% better weight (12.2 vs 2.6 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 750% more heat output (11,601 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 72% more home mining score (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $305 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$0.92 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$640 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$975 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$1,310 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or Goldshell KA BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or Goldshell KA BOX?
The Goldshell KA BOX is quieter at 55 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-KS Max at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Goldshell KA BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-KS Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Goldshell KA BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 29.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficiency (309 vs 339 J/TH).