iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Goldshell CK-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 Max | Specification | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 30.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 110.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 6.6 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3 Max
Goldshell CK-LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-N3 Max, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 376% more hashrate (30.0 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N3 Max's favour. That said, the Goldshell CK-LITE isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-N3 Max and Goldshell CK-LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 376% more hashrate (30.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 64% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,200 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 42% better efficiency (110 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 12% better weight (6.6 vs 7.5 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 175% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 44% more home mining score (36.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-N3 Max | Metric | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$6.84 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$2,496 | Net after 1 year | -$1,567 |
| -$4,993 | Net after 2 years | -$2,536 |
| -$7,489 | Net after 3 years | -$3,504 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-LITEScore: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3 Max110.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or the Goldshell CK-LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-LITE is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-6.84/day for the iBeLink BM-N3 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell CK-LITE is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N3 Max at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or the Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell CK-LITE scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N3 Max and Goldshell CK-LITE?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max runs at 110.0 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 80.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficiency (110 vs 190 J/TH).