iBeLink BM-S3+ vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S3+ | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 19.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 3,100 W |
| 136.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S3+
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-S3+ edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 32% more hashrate (25.0 vs 19.0 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S3+ and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 32% more hashrate (25.0 vs 19.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 9% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,100 W)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 17% better efficiency (136 vs 163 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 10% more heat output (11,601 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-S3+ | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $3,299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,330 |
| -$7.27 | Daily net profit | -$6.77 |
| -$5,954 | Net after 1 year | -$3,800 |
| -$8,609 | Net after 2 years | -$6,270 |
| -$11,264 | Net after 3 years | -$8,740 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S3+136.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-S3+ vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner is more profitable at $-6.77/day compared to $-7.27/day for the iBeLink BM-S3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-S3+ vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-S3+ or iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-S3+ and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ runs at 136.0 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner runs at 163.2 J/TH — a difference of 27.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (136 vs 163 J/TH).