Goldshell CK-BOX vs Bitmain CK6-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Specification | Bitmain CK6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 17.0 TH/s |
| 215 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 204.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 2,000.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 734 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-BOX
Bitmain CK6-SE
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain CK6-SE wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 1519% more hashrate (1.1 vs 17.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain CK6-SE's favour. The Goldshell CK-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK-BOX and Bitmain CK6-SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain CK6-SE 1519% more hashrate (1.1 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (215 vs 3,300 W)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 5% better efficiency (205 vs 194 J/TH)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 99% better weight (2,000.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 1435% more heat output (734 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 7% more home mining score (31.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Metric | Bitmain CK6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.48 | Daily net profit | -$7.31 |
| -$365 | Net after 1 year | -$2,667 |
| -$539 | Net after 2 years | -$5,335 |
| -$714 | Net after 3 years | -$8,002 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain CK6-SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK-BOX or the Bitmain CK6-SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-7.31/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell CK-BOX vs Bitmain CK6-SE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain CK6-SE is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Bitmain CK6-SE?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Bitmain CK6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK-BOX and Bitmain CK6-SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 10.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficiency (205 vs 194 J/TH).