Goldshell CK6 vs Bitmain CK6-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK6 | Specification | Bitmain CK6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 19.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 17.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 171.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 8,500.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK6
Bitmain CK6-SE
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK6 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 12% better efficiency (171 vs 194 J/TH) in the Goldshell CK6's favour. The Bitmain CK6-SE holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell CK6 and Bitmain CK6-SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK6 14% more hashrate (19.3 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK6 12% better efficiency (171 vs 194 J/TH)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 32% more home mining score (22.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell CK6 | Metric | Bitmain CK6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.22 | Daily net profit | -$7.31 |
| -$3,436 | Net after 1 year | -$2,667 |
| -$6,073 | Net after 2 years | -$5,335 |
| -$8,710 | Net after 3 years | -$8,002 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain CK6-SEScore: 29/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK6171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell CK6 vs Bitmain CK6-SE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK6 is more profitable at $-7.22/day compared to $-7.31/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell CK6 or the Bitmain CK6-SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain CK6-SE is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell CK6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell CK6 vs Bitmain CK6-SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain CK6-SE scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK6 and Bitmain CK6-SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH while the Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 23.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (171 vs 194 J/TH).