Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo G1

iPollo G1

Hashrate 36.0 GH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 77,777.8 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini SE

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Hashrate 220.0 MH/s Power 116 W Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH

iPollo G1 vs iPollo V1 Mini SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo G1 Specification iPollo V1 Mini SE
36.0 GH/s Hashrate 220.0 MH/s
2,800 W Power Consumption 116 W
77,777.8 J/TH Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH
Noise Level
19,000.0 kg Weight 2.1 kg
9,554 BTU/hr BTU Output 396 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Cuckatoo32 Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo G1

Daily Revenue 0.00000002 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$6.72
Monthly -$201.56
Yearly -$2,452.33

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.28
Daily Profit -$0.28
Monthly -$8.35
Yearly -$101.61

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo G1, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 16264% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo G1's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini SE claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo G1 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iPollo G1 and iPollo V1 Mini SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo G1 16264% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 96% better power draw (2,800 vs 116 W)
  • iPollo G1 85% better efficiency (77,778 vs 527,273 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 100% better weight (19,000.0 vs 2.1 kg)
  • iPollo G1 2314% more heat output (9,554 vs 396 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 36% more home mining score (22.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

iPollo G1 Metric iPollo V1 Mini SE
$1,599 Upfront cost (MSRP) $279
-$6.72 Daily net profit -$0.28
-$4,051 Net after 1 year -$381
-$6,504 Net after 2 years -$482
-$8,956 Net after 3 years -$584
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo G1

77,777.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo G1 or the iPollo V1 Mini SE?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-6.72/day for the iPollo G1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iPollo G1 vs iPollo V1 Mini SE: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

iPollo G1 vs iPollo V1 Mini SE: which fits a residential setup better?

The iPollo V1 Mini SE scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo G1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iPollo G1 vs iPollo V1 Mini SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iPollo G1 runs at 77,777.8 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE runs at 527,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 449,495.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (77,778 vs 527,273 J/TH).