Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo V1 Hyd

iPollo V1 Hyd

Hashrate 900.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini SE

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Hashrate 220.0 MH/s Power 116 W Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH

iPollo V1 Hyd vs iPollo V1 Mini SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Hyd Specification iPollo V1 Mini SE
900.0 MH/s Hashrate 220.0 MH/s
800 W Power Consumption 116 W
888,888.9 J/TH Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH
Noise Level
8.0 kg Weight 2.1 kg
2,730 BTU/hr BTU Output 396 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.28
Daily Profit -$0.28
Monthly -$8.35
Yearly -$101.61

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V1 Mini SE, which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 86% better power draw (800 vs 116 W). The iPollo V1 Hyd holds the edge in price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo V1 Mini SE — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Hyd and iPollo V1 Mini SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo V1 Hyd 309% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 86% better power draw (800 vs 116 W)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 41% better efficiency (888,889 vs 527,273 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 74% better weight (8.0 vs 2.1 kg)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 590% more heat output (2,730 vs 396 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo V1 Hyd Metric iPollo V1 Mini SE
$489 Upfront cost (MSRP) $279
-$1.92 Daily net profit -$0.28
-$1,190 Net after 1 year -$381
-$1,891 Net after 2 years -$482
-$2,591 Net after 3 years -$584
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1 Mini SE

527,272.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Hyd or the iPollo V1 Mini SE?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-1.92/day for the iPollo V1 Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iPollo V1 Hyd vs iPollo V1 Mini SE: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Hyd or iPollo V1 Mini SE?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Hyd and iPollo V1 Mini SE?

The iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE runs at 527,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 361,616.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficiency (888,889 vs 527,273 J/TH).