Goldshell HS-BOX vs Goldshell HS BOX II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS-BOX | Specification | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| 235.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 460.0 GH/s |
| 230 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 978.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 869.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 785 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b+sha3 | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS-BOX
Goldshell HS BOX II
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell HS BOX II wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score). The standout gap is 96% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.5 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS BOX II's favour. The Goldshell HS-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS-BOX and Goldshell HS BOX II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS BOX II 96% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 43% better power draw (230 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 11% better efficiency (979 vs 870 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 74% more heat output (785 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 10% more home mining score (31.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS-BOX | Metric | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $325 |
| -$0.54 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$297 | Net after 1 year | -$670 |
| -$496 | Net after 2 years | -$1,014 |
| -$694 | Net after 3 years | -$1,359 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS BOX IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS BOX II869.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell HS-BOX vs Goldshell HS BOX II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.54/day compared to $-0.94/day for the Goldshell HS BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell HS-BOX vs Goldshell HS BOX II: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS-BOX or Goldshell HS BOX II?
The Goldshell HS BOX II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell HS-BOX and Goldshell HS BOX II on J/TH?
The Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 978.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS BOX II runs at 869.6 J/TH — a difference of 109.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 11% better efficiency (979 vs 870 J/TH).