Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell HS-BOX

Goldshell HS-BOX

Hashrate 235.0 GH/s Power 230 W Efficiency 978.7 J/TH
VS
Goldshell HS1-PLUS

Goldshell HS1-PLUS

Hashrate 105.0 GH/s Power 115 W Efficiency 1,095.2 J/TH

Goldshell HS-BOX vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS-BOX Specification Goldshell HS1-PLUS
235.0 GH/s Hashrate 105.0 GH/s
230 W Power Consumption 115 W
978.7 J/TH Efficiency 1,095.2 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 450.0 kg
785 BTU/hr BTU Output 392 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Blake2b+sha3 Algorithm Blake2b+sha3
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000011 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.55
Daily Profit -$0.54
Monthly -$16.31
Yearly -$198.44

Goldshell HS1-PLUS

Daily Revenue 0.00000005 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.28
Daily Profit -$0.27
Monthly -$8.17
Yearly -$99.38

Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS-BOX edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 124% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS-BOX's favour. The Goldshell HS1-PLUS holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell HS-BOX — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS-BOX and Goldshell HS1-PLUS sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell HS-BOX 124% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS1-PLUS 50% better power draw (230 vs 115 W)
  • Goldshell HS-BOX 11% better efficiency (979 vs 1,095 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS-BOX 100% more heat output (785 vs 392 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell HS-BOX 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Goldshell HS-BOX Metric Goldshell HS1-PLUS
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $900
-$0.54 Daily net profit -$0.27
-$297 Net after 1 year -$999
-$496 Net after 2 years -$1,099
-$694 Net after 3 years -$1,198
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell HS-BOX

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS-BOX

978.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell HS-BOX vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS is more profitable at $-0.27/day compared to $-0.54/day for the Goldshell HS-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell HS-BOX or the Goldshell HS1-PLUS better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS-BOX or Goldshell HS1-PLUS?

The Goldshell HS-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell HS1-PLUS). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell HS-BOX and Goldshell HS1-PLUS?

The Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 978.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS1-PLUS runs at 1,095.2 J/TH — a difference of 116.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 11% better efficiency (979 vs 1,095 J/TH).