Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell HS1-PLUS

Goldshell HS1-PLUS

Hashrate 105.0 GH/s Power 115 W Efficiency 1,095.2 J/TH
VS
Goldshell HS6 SE

Goldshell HS6 SE

Hashrate 3.7 TH/s Power 3,400 W Efficiency 918.9 J/TH

Goldshell HS1-PLUS vs Goldshell HS6 SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS1-PLUS Specification Goldshell HS6 SE
105.0 GH/s Hashrate 3.7 TH/s
115 W Power Consumption 3,400 W
1,095.2 J/TH Efficiency 918.9 J/TH
Noise Level
450.0 kg Weight
392 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b+sha3 Algorithm Blake2b+sha3
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS1-PLUS

Daily Revenue 0.00000005 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.28
Daily Profit -$0.27
Monthly -$8.17
Yearly -$99.38

Goldshell HS6 SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000170 BTC $0.13
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$8.03
Monthly -$240.87
Yearly -$2,930.57

Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell HS6 SE wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 3424% more hashrate (0.1 vs 3.7 TH/s). The Goldshell HS1-PLUS claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell HS6 SE — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Goldshell HS1-PLUS and Goldshell HS6 SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Goldshell HS6 SE 3424% more hashrate (0.1 vs 3.7 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS1-PLUS 97% better power draw (115 vs 3,400 W)
  • Goldshell HS6 SE 16% better efficiency (1,095 vs 919 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS6 SE 2856% more heat output (392 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell HS1-PLUS 36% more home mining score (30.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell HS1-PLUS Metric Goldshell HS6 SE
$900 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,060
-$0.27 Daily net profit -$8.03
-$999 Net after 1 year -$3,991
-$1,099 Net after 2 years -$6,921
-$1,198 Net after 3 years -$9,852
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell HS1-PLUS

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS6 SE

918.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS or the Goldshell HS6 SE?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS is more profitable at $-0.27/day compared to $-8.03/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell HS1-PLUS vs Goldshell HS6 SE: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS or Goldshell HS6 SE?

The Goldshell HS1-PLUS scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell HS1-PLUS and Goldshell HS6 SE?

The Goldshell HS1-PLUS runs at 1,095.2 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH — a difference of 176.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficiency (1,095 vs 919 J/TH).