Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS5 | Specification | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7 TH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 GH/s |
| 2,650 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 981.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 222.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,500.0 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 9,042 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS5
Goldshell SC-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC-BOX, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 92% better power draw (2,650 vs 200 W). The Goldshell HS5 claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell HS5 and Goldshell SC-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS5 200% more hashrate (2.7 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 92% better power draw (2,650 vs 200 W)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 77% better efficiency (981 vs 222 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 76% better weight (8,500 vs 2,000 kg)
- Goldshell HS5 1225% more heat output (9,042 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 50% more home mining score (22.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS5 | Metric | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $949 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$6.26 | Daily net profit | -$0.45 |
| -$3,235 | Net after 1 year | -$463 |
| -$5,522 | Net after 2 years | -$626 |
| -$7,808 | Net after 3 years | -$790 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC-BOXScore: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC-BOX222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS5 or the Goldshell SC-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC-BOX is more profitable at $-0.45/day compared to $-6.26/day for the Goldshell HS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS5 or Goldshell SC-BOX?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS5 or Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell SC-BOX scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell HS5 and Goldshell SC-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell HS5 runs at 981.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC-BOX runs at 222.2 J/TH — a difference of 759.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (981 vs 222 J/TH).