Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo V1 Mini SE

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Hashrate 220.0 MH/s Power 116 W Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2H

iPollo V2H

Hashrate 3.4 GH/s Power 475 W Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH

iPollo V1 Mini SE vs iPollo V2H

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Mini SE Specification iPollo V2H
220.0 MH/s Hashrate 3.4 GH/s
116 W Power Consumption 475 W
527,272.7 J/TH Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH
Noise Level 65 dB
2.1 kg Weight 7.9 kg
396 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,621 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 55/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.28
Daily Profit -$0.28
Monthly -$8.35
Yearly -$101.61

iPollo V2H

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.14
Daily Profit -$1.14
Monthly -$34.20
Yearly -$416.06

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V2H edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1445% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini SE claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo V2H — wins on 5 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini SE and iPollo V2H sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo V2H 1445% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 76% better power draw (116 vs 475 W)
  • iPollo V2H 74% better efficiency (527,273 vs 139,706 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 73% better weight (2.1 vs 7.9 kg)
  • iPollo V2H 309% more heat output (396 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2H 83% more home mining score (30.0 vs 55.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo V1 Mini SE Metric iPollo V2H
$279 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,850
-$0.28 Daily net profit -$1.14
-$381 Net after 1 year -$2,266
-$482 Net after 2 years -$2,682
-$584 Net after 3 years -$3,098
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2H

Score: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2H

139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iPollo V1 Mini SE vs iPollo V2H: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-1.14/day for the iPollo V2H. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini SE or iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini SE or the iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Mini SE and iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V1 Mini SE runs at 527,272.7 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 387,566.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (527,273 vs 139,706 J/TH).