iPollo V1 Mini SE vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini SE | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 220.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 GH/s |
| 116 W | Power Consumption | 550 W |
| 527,272.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 2.1 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 396 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini SE
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X16-QE, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 695% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini SE claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini SE and Jasminer X16-QE sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-QE 695% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE 79% better power draw (116 vs 550 W)
- Jasminer X16-QE 40% better efficiency (527,273 vs 314,286 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE 79% better weight (2.1 vs 10.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-QE 374% more heat output (396 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-QE 117% more home mining score (30.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Mini SE | Metric | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| $279 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $469 |
| -$0.28 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$381 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$482 | Net after 2 years | -$1,433 |
| -$584 | Net after 3 years | -$1,914 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QEScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini SE or Jasminer X16-QE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-1.32/day for the Jasminer X16-QE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini SE vs Jasminer X16-QE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iPollo V1 Mini SE vs Jasminer X16-QE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini SE vs Jasminer X16-QE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini SE runs at 527,272.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 212,987.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficiency (527,273 vs 314,286 J/TH).