iPollo V2 vs iPollo V2H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V2 | Specification | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 3.4 GH/s |
| 1,500 W | Power Consumption | 475 W |
| 150,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 139,705.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 16.5 kg | Weight | 7.9 kg |
| 5,118 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,621 BTU/hr |
| 48/100 | Home Mining Score | 55/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V2
iPollo V2H
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V2H wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 68% better power draw (1,500 vs 475 W). The iPollo V2 claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V2 and iPollo V2H actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iPollo V2 194% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2H 68% better power draw (1,500 vs 475 W)
- iPollo V2H 7% better efficiency (150,000 vs 139,706 J/TH)
- iPollo V2H 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- iPollo V2H 52% better weight (16.5 vs 7.9 kg)
- iPollo V2 216% more heat output (5,118 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2H 15% more home mining score (48.0 vs 55.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V2 | Metric | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| $5,140 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,850 |
| -$3.60 | Daily net profit | -$1.14 |
| -$6,454 | Net after 1 year | -$2,266 |
| -$7,768 | Net after 2 years | -$2,682 |
| -$9,082 | Net after 3 years | -$3,098 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2HScore: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2H139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V2 or iPollo V2H more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-3.60/day for the iPollo V2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V2 or the iPollo V2H better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iPollo V2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V2 or iPollo V2H?
The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 48/100 for the iPollo V2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V2 and iPollo V2H?
The iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 10,294.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (150,000 vs 139,706 J/TH).