Whatsminer M60S++ vs Whatsminer M63
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Whatsminer M60S++ | Specification | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| 220.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 360.0 TH/s |
| 3,960 W | Power Consumption | 7,200 W |
| 18.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 13,512 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,566 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Whatsminer M60S++
Whatsminer M63
Based on BTC price of $77,089 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M63 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 64% more hashrate (220 vs 360 TH/s). That said, the Whatsminer M60S++ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins efficiency and power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Whatsminer M60S++ and Whatsminer M63 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M63 64% more hashrate (220 vs 360 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 45% better power draw (3,960 vs 7,200 W)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 10% better efficiency (18.0 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 49% better weight (14.0 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M63 82% more heat output (13,512 vs 24,566 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63 47% more home mining score (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Whatsminer M60S++ | Metric | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| $7,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $11,000 |
| -$1.70 | Daily net profit | -$4.51 |
| -$7,620 | Net after 1 year | -$12,646 |
| -$8,241 | Net after 2 years | -$14,292 |
| -$8,861 | Net after 3 years | -$15,937 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S++18.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Whatsminer M60S++ or Whatsminer M63 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S++ is more profitable at $-1.70/day compared to $-4.51/day for the Whatsminer M63. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Whatsminer M60S++ vs Whatsminer M63: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M63 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Whatsminer M60S++ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Whatsminer M60S++ or Whatsminer M63?
The Whatsminer M63 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Whatsminer M60S++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Whatsminer M60S++ and Whatsminer M63 on J/TH?
The Whatsminer M60S++ runs at 18.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63 runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 2.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficiency (18.0 vs 20.0 J/TH).
