Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Aisen A1 Pro

Aisen A1 Pro

Taux de hachage 23.0 TH/s Puissance 2,200 W Efficiency 95.7 J/TH
VS
Bitaxe GT

Bitaxe GT

Taux de hachage 5.0 TH/s Puissance 75 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH

Aisen A1 Pro vs Bitaxe GT

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Aisen A1 Pro Specification Bitaxe GT
23.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 5.0 TH/s
2,200 W Consommation électrique 75 W
95.7 J/TH Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 42 dB
Weight 0.4 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 256 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 64/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Aisen Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Aisen A1 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00001041 BTC $0.65
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$4.63
Monthly -$138.79
Yearly -$1,688.61

Bitaxe GT

Daily Revenue 0.00000226 BTC $0.14
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit -$0.04
Monthly -$1.14
Yearly -$13.83

Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitaxe GT l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 97% better power draw (2,200.0 vs 75.0 W) in the Bitaxe GT's favour. That said, the Aisen A1 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitaxe GT — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Aisen A1 Pro and Bitaxe GT diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Aisen A1 Pro 360% more hashrate (23.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe GT 97% better power draw (2,200.0 vs 75.0 W)
  • Bitaxe GT 84% better efficacité (95.7 vs 15.0 J/TH)
  • Aisen A1 Pro 2833% more heat output (7,506 vs 256 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe GT 146% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 64.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Aisen A1 Pro Metric Bitaxe GT
Upfront cost (MSRP) $499
-$4.63 Daily net profit -$0.04
-$1,689 Net after 1 year -$513
-$3,377 Net after 2 years -$527
-$5,066 Net after 3 years -$540
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe GT

Score: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe GT

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Aisen A1 Pro or Bitaxe GT more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $-0.04/day compared to $-4.63/day for the Aisen A1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Aisen A1 Pro vs Bitaxe GT: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Aisen A1 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Aisen A1 Pro or Bitaxe GT?

The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Aisen A1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Aisen A1 Pro vs Bitaxe GT: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Aisen A1 Pro runs at 95.7 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 80.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (95.7 vs 15.0 J/TH).