Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh)
Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) vs Antminer E9 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) | Specification | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 96.0 KH/s | Taux de hachage | 3,680.0 MH/s |
| 528 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 5,500,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 597,826.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.2 kg |
| 1,802 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 40/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Tensority | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh)
Antminer E9 Pro
Based on BTC price of $64,118 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer E9 Pro, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 3833233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Antminer E9 Pro's favour. The Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) and Antminer E9 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer E9 Pro 3833233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) 76% better power draw (528 vs 2,200 W)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better efficacité (5,500,000,000 vs 597,826 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 317% more heat output (1,802 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 33% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 40.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) | Metric | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$463 | Net after 1 year | -$4,927 |
| -$925 | Net after 2 years | -$6,854 |
| -$1,388 | Net after 3 years | -$8,781 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer E9 Pro597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) or the Antminer E9 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) or the Antminer E9 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) or Antminer E9 Pro?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) and Antminer E9 Pro?
The Bitmain Antminer B7 (96Kh) runs at 5,500,000,000.0 J/TH while the Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH — a difference of 5,499,402,173.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,500,000,000 vs 597,826 J/TH).