Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) vs Antminer S19j Pro+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) | Specification | Antminer S19j Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| 20.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 117.0 TH/s |
| 1,530 W | Consommation électrique | 3,355 W |
| 74.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 28.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6.5 kg | Weight | 13.6 kg |
| 5,220 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,447 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th)
Antminer S19j Pro+
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer S19j Pro+ l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 471% more hashrate (20.5 vs 117.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) and Antminer S19j Pro+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S19j Pro+ 471% more hashrate (20.5 vs 117.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) 54% better power draw (1,530 vs 3,355 W)
- Antminer S19j Pro+ 62% better efficacité (74.6 vs 28.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) 52% better weight (6.5 vs 13.6 kg)
- Antminer S19j Pro+ 119% more heat output (5,220 vs 11,447 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19j Pro+ 200% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) | Metric | Antminer S19j Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$3.09 | Daily net profit | -$4.72 |
| -$1,127 | Net after 1 year | -$4,922 |
| -$2,254 | Net after 2 years | -$6,644 |
| -$3,381 | Net after 3 years | -$8,367 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19j Pro+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19j Pro+28.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) or the Antminer S19j Pro+?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.09/day compared to $-4.72/day for the Antminer S19j Pro+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) or the Antminer S19j Pro+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer S19j Pro+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) or Antminer S19j Pro+?
The Antminer S19j Pro+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) and Antminer S19j Pro+ on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S11 (20.5Th) runs at 74.6 J/TH while the Antminer S19j Pro+ runs at 28.7 J/TH — a difference of 46.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (74.6 vs 28.7 J/TH).