Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer AL1

Antminer AL1

Taux de hachage 16.0 TH/s Puissance 3,360 W Efficiency 210.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer S19j Pro+

Antminer S19j Pro+

Taux de hachage 117.0 TH/s Puissance 3,355 W Efficiency 28.7 J/TH

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S19j Pro+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer AL1 Specification Antminer S19j Pro+
16.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 117.0 TH/s
3,360 W Consommation électrique 3,355 W
210.0 J/TH Efficiency 28.7 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
14.5 kg Weight 13.6 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,447 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 84/100
Release Year
Blake3 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer AL1

Daily Revenue 0.00000724 BTC $0.47
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$7.60
Monthly -$227.95
Yearly -$2,773.43

Antminer S19j Pro+

Daily Revenue 0.00005293 BTC $3.40
Daily Electricity -$8.05
Daily Profit -$4.65
Monthly -$139.43
Yearly -$1,696.39

Based on BTC price of $64,316 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S19j Pro+, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 86% better efficacité (210.0 vs 28.7 J/TH) in the Antminer S19j Pro+'s favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer S19j Pro+ — l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Antminer AL1 and Antminer S19j Pro+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer S19j Pro+ 631% more hashrate (16.0 vs 117.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S19j Pro+ 86% better efficacité (210.0 vs 28.7 J/TH)
  • Antminer S19j Pro+ 6% better weight (14.5 vs 13.6 kg)
  • Antminer S19j Pro+ 133% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 84.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer AL1 Metric Antminer S19j Pro+
$10,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,200
-$7.60 Daily net profit -$4.65
-$12,773 Net after 1 year -$4,896
-$15,547 Net after 2 years -$6,593
-$18,320 Net after 3 years -$8,289
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S19j Pro+

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S19j Pro+

28.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer AL1 or Antminer S19j Pro+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19j Pro+ is more profitable at $-4.65/day compared to $-7.60/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer AL1 or the Antminer S19j Pro+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Antminer S19j Pro+?

The Antminer S19j Pro+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer AL1 and Antminer S19j Pro+ on J/TH?

The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer S19j Pro+ runs at 28.7 J/TH — a difference of 181.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (210.0 vs 28.7 J/TH).