Antminer S19 Pro+ vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 Pro+ | Specification | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| 120.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 1,100 W |
| 28.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 91.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 3.5 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,753 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 Pro+
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 Pro+ comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 900% more hashrate (120.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) holds the edge in consommation électrique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S19 Pro+ and Antminer Slim Edition (S9) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 900% more hashrate (120.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 67% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,100 W)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 69% better efficacité (28.0 vs 91.7 J/TH)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 76% better weight (14.4 vs 3.5 kg)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 205% more heat output (11,464 vs 3,753 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 62% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer S19 Pro+ | Metric | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$4.64 | Daily net profit | -$2.30 |
| -$4,695 | Net after 1 year | -$1,189 |
| -$6,391 | Net after 2 years | -$2,028 |
| -$8,086 | Net after 3 years | -$2,866 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 Pro+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 Pro+28.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer S19 Pro+ or the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.30/day compared to $-4.64/day for the Antminer S19 Pro+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 Pro+ or Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Antminer S19 Pro+ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S19 Pro+ vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19 Pro+ and Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ runs at 28.0 J/TH while the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 63.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (28.0 vs 91.7 J/TH).