Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer S19

Antminer S19

Taux de hachage 95.0 TH/s Puissance 3,250 W Efficiency 34.2 J/TH
VS
Bitaxe Ultra

Bitaxe Ultra

Taux de hachage 500.0 GH/s Puissance 15 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Antminer S19 vs Bitaxe Ultra

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19 Specification Bitaxe Ultra
95.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 500.0 GH/s
3,250 W Consommation électrique 15 W
34.2 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 35 dB
14.4 kg Weight 0.3 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 51 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19

Daily Revenue 0.00004298 BTC $2.69
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.24
Yearly -$1,864.45

Bitaxe Ultra

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.02
Monthly -$0.65
Yearly -$7.97

Based on BTC price of $62,634 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitaxe Ultra l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 100% better power draw (3,250.0 vs 15.0 W) in the Bitaxe Ultra's favour. The Antminer S19 claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitaxe Ultra — l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer S19 and Bitaxe Ultra actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer S19 18900% more hashrate (95.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 100% better power draw (3,250.0 vs 15.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 12% better efficacité (34.2 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 98% better weight (14.4 vs 0.3 kg)
  • Antminer S19 21558% more heat output (11,089.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S19 20% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 70.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer S19 Metric Bitaxe Ultra
$2,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $79
-$5.11 Daily net profit -$0.02
-$3,864 Net after 1 year -$87
-$5,729 Net after 2 years -$95
-$7,593 Net after 3 years -$103
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S19

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Ultra

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer S19 vs Bitaxe Ultra: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Antminer S19. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S19 or the Bitaxe Ultra better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Antminer S19 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S19 or Bitaxe Ultra?

The Antminer S19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 70/100 for the Bitaxe Ultra). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer S19 and Bitaxe Ultra on J/TH?

The Antminer S19 runs at 34.2 J/TH while the Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficacité (34.2 vs 30.0 J/TH).