Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer S19

Antminer S19

Taux de hachage 95.0 TH/s Puissance 3,250 W Efficiency 34.2 J/TH
VS
NerdQAxe

NerdQAxe

Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s Puissance 80 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH

Antminer S19 vs NerdQAxe

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19 Specification NerdQAxe
95.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s
3,250 W Consommation électrique 80 W
34.2 J/TH Efficiency 40.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 40 dB
14.4 kg Weight 0.4 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 273 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 71/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19

Daily Revenue 0.00004298 BTC $2.70
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$5.10
Monthly -$153.00
Yearly -$1,861.50

NerdQAxe

Daily Revenue 0.00000090 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$0.19
Daily Profit -$0.14
Monthly -$4.05
Yearly -$49.33

Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 4650% more hashrate (95.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The NerdQAxe holds the edge in consommation électrique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer S19 — l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 and NerdQAxe sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer S19 4650% more hashrate (95.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
  • NerdQAxe 98% better power draw (3,250.0 vs 80.0 W)
  • Antminer S19 14% better efficacité (34.2 vs 40.0 J/TH)
  • NerdQAxe 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
  • NerdQAxe 97% better weight (14.4 vs 0.4 kg)
  • Antminer S19 3962% more heat output (11,089 vs 273 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S19 18% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 71.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer S19 Metric NerdQAxe
$2,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $249
-$5.10 Daily net profit -$0.14
-$3,861 Net after 1 year -$298
-$5,723 Net after 2 years -$348
-$7,584 Net after 3 years -$397
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S19

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S19

34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer S19 or NerdQAxe more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-5.10/day for the Antminer S19. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S19 or the NerdQAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The NerdQAxe is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer S19 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S19 or NerdQAxe?

The Antminer S19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 71/100 for the NerdQAxe). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer S19 and NerdQAxe on J/TH?

The Antminer S19 runs at 34.2 J/TH while the NerdQAxe runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 5.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficacité (34.2 vs 40.0 J/TH).