Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 134.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 114.0 TH/s |
| 2,881 W | Consommation électrique | 3,306 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 9,830 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $63,390 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 26% better efficacité (21.5 vs 29.0 J/TH). The Whatsminer M50 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Whatsminer M50 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 18% more hashrate (134 vs 114 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 13% better power draw (2,881 vs 3,306 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 26% better efficacité (21.5 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50 13% better weight (14.4 vs 12.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50 15% more heat output (9,830 vs 11,280 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| $483 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$3.07 | Daily net profit | -$4.67 |
| -$1,604 | Net after 1 year | -$4,303 |
| -$2,725 | Net after 2 years | -$6,006 |
| -$3,846 | Net after 3 years | -$7,708 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or Whatsminer M50 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) is more profitable at $-3.07/day compared to $-4.67/day for the Whatsminer M50. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Whatsminer M50: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or the Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Whatsminer M50?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 7.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficacité (21.5 vs 29.0 J/TH).