Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 186.0 TH/s |
| 3,010 W | Consommation électrique | 3,480 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 10,270 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M60S comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 33% more hashrate (140 vs 186 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M60S's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) and Whatsminer M60S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M60S 33% more hashrate (140 vs 186 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 14% better power draw (3,010 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 13% better efficacité (21.5 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60S 3% better weight (14.5 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S 16% more heat output (10,270 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| $522 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$3.24 | Daily net profit | -$3.05 |
| -$1,703 | Net after 1 year | -$6,614 |
| -$2,884 | Net after 2 years | -$7,728 |
| -$4,064 | Net after 3 years | -$8,842 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or the Whatsminer M60S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-3.05/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or Whatsminer M60S?
The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or the Whatsminer M60S?
The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) and Whatsminer M60S on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 2.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficacité (21.5 vs 18.7 J/TH).