Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 12.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 1,225 W | Consommation électrique | 75 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 42 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 4,180 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitaxe GT, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 94% better power draw (1,225.0 vs 75.0 W). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) and Bitaxe GT diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) 150% more hashrate (12.5 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 94% better power draw (1,225.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 85% better efficacité (98.0 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 90% better weight (4.2 vs 0.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) 1533% more heat output (4,180 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 106% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$2.58 | Daily net profit | -$0.04 |
| -$1,006 | Net after 1 year | -$512 |
| -$1,948 | Net after 2 years | -$525 |
| -$2,889 | Net after 3 years | -$538 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) or the Bitaxe GT?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $-0.04/day compared to $-2.58/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) or the Bitaxe GT better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) vs Bitaxe GT: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) and Bitaxe GT on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 83.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (98.0 vs 15.0 J/TH).