Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) vs Avalon A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) | Specification | Avalon A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 84.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 130.0 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 37.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Avalon A1366
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1366 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 55% more hashrate (84.0 vs 130.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) and Avalon A1366 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1366 55% more hashrate (84.0 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 3% better power draw (3,150 vs 3,250 W)
- Avalon A1366 33% better efficacité (37.5 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Avalon A1366 11% better weight (14.2 vs 12.6 kg)
- Avalon A1366 3% more heat output (10,748 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1366 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) | Metric | Avalon A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| $179 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$5.17 | Daily net profit | -$4.10 |
| -$2,065 | Net after 1 year | -$4,995 |
| -$3,951 | Net after 2 years | -$6,490 |
| -$5,836 | Net after 3 years | -$7,985 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1366Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) or Avalon A1366 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-4.10/day compared to $-5.17/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) vs Avalon A1366: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Avalon A1366 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) vs Avalon A1366: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1366 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) and Avalon A1366 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) runs at 37.5 J/TH while the Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 12.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (37.5 vs 25.0 J/TH).