Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Taux de hachage 375.0 TH/s Puissance 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

Taux de hachage 262.0 TH/s Puissance 3,275 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+
375.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 262.0 TH/s
5,625 W Consommation électrique 3,275 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
55 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
Weight 13.5 kg
19,193 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,174 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00016965 BTC $10.92
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$2.58
Monthly -$77.54
Yearly -$943.37

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

Daily Revenue 0.00011853 BTC $7.63
Daily Electricity -$7.86
Daily Profit -$0.23
Monthly -$7.01
Yearly -$85.32

Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 42% better power draw (5,625 vs 3,275 W). The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 holds the edge in hashrate and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 43% more hashrate (375 vs 262 TH/s)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 42% better power draw (5,625 vs 3,275 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 17% better efficacité (15.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 72% more heat output (19,193 vs 11,174 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-2.58/day for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficacité (15.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).