Avalon A1366 vs Whatsminer M56
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1366 | Specification | Whatsminer M56 |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 194.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 5,550 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 28.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 12.6 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,937 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1366
Whatsminer M56
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M56, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB). The Avalon A1366 claws back ground on efficacité and consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1366 and Whatsminer M56 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M56 49% more hashrate (130 vs 194 TH/s)
- Avalon A1366 41% better power draw (3,250 vs 5,550 W)
- Avalon A1366 13% better efficacité (25.0 vs 28.6 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M56 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Avalon A1366 3% better weight (12.6 vs 13.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M56 71% more heat output (11,089 vs 18,937 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M56 22% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1366 | Metric | Whatsminer M56 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$4.10 | Daily net profit | -$7.79 |
| -$4,995 | Net after 1 year | -$7,844 |
| -$6,490 | Net after 2 years | -$10,688 |
| -$7,985 | Net after 3 years | -$13,533 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M56Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1366 or the Whatsminer M56?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-4.10/day compared to $-7.79/day for the Whatsminer M56. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1366 vs Whatsminer M56: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M56 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Avalon A1366 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1366 or the Whatsminer M56?
The Whatsminer M56 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1366 and Whatsminer M56?
The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M56 runs at 28.6 J/TH — a difference of 3.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficacité (25.0 vs 28.6 J/TH).