Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bolon Miner B11

Bolon Miner B11

Taux de hachage 70.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 47.1 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M50S

Whatsminer M50S

Taux de hachage 126.0 TH/s Puissance 3,276 W Efficiency 26.0 J/TH

Bolon Miner B11 vs Whatsminer M50S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bolon Miner B11 Specification Whatsminer M50S
70.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 126.0 TH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 3,276 W
47.1 J/TH Efficiency 26.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 75 dB
11.5 kg Weight 12.8 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,178 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bolon Miner Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bolon Miner B11

Daily Revenue 0.00003167 BTC $1.99
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$5.93
Monthly -$177.77
Yearly -$2,162.82

Whatsminer M50S

Daily Revenue 0.00005700 BTC $3.59
Daily Electricity -$7.86
Daily Profit -$4.27
Monthly -$128.17
Yearly -$1,559.40

Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M50S edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 45% better efficacité (47.1 vs 26.0 J/TH) in the Whatsminer M50S's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Whatsminer M50S — l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bolon Miner B11 and Whatsminer M50S actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Whatsminer M50S 80% more hashrate (70.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
  • Whatsminer M50S 1% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,276 W)
  • Whatsminer M50S 45% better efficacité (47.1 vs 26.0 J/TH)
  • Bolon Miner B11 10% better weight (11.5 vs 12.8 kg)
  • Bolon Miner B11 1% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M50S 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bolon Miner B11 Metric Whatsminer M50S
Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,200
-$5.93 Daily net profit -$4.27
-$2,163 Net after 1 year -$4,759
-$4,326 Net after 2 years -$6,319
-$6,488 Net after 3 years -$7,878
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M50S

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M50S

26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bolon Miner B11 vs Whatsminer M50S: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-4.27/day compared to $-5.93/day for the Bolon Miner B11. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bolon Miner B11 or Whatsminer M50S?

The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bolon Miner B11 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bolon Miner B11 or the Whatsminer M50S?

The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bolon Miner B11 and Whatsminer M50S?

The Bolon Miner B11 runs at 47.1 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 21.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (47.1 vs 26.0 J/TH).