Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitaxe GT

Bitaxe GT

Taux de hachage 5.0 TH/s Puissance 75 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M30S++

Whatsminer M30S++

Taux de hachage 112.0 TH/s Puissance 3,472 W Efficiency 31.0 J/TH

Bitaxe GT vs Whatsminer M30S++

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe GT Specification Whatsminer M30S++
5.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 112.0 TH/s
75 W Consommation électrique 3,472 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 31.0 J/TH
42 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
0.4 kg Weight 12.0 kg
256 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,847 BTU/hr
64/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe GT

Daily Revenue 0.00000226 BTC $0.14
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit -$0.04
Monthly -$1.06
Yearly -$12.86

Whatsminer M30S++

Daily Revenue 0.00005067 BTC $3.24
Daily Electricity -$8.33
Daily Profit -$5.09
Monthly -$152.70
Yearly -$1,857.83

Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe GT comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 98% better power draw (75.0 vs 3,472.0 W). That said, the Whatsminer M30S++ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitaxe GT — l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitaxe GT and Whatsminer M30S++ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M30S++ 2140% more hashrate (5.0 vs 112.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe GT 98% better power draw (75.0 vs 3,472.0 W)
  • Bitaxe GT 52% better efficacité (15.0 vs 31.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe GT 44% better noise (42.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Bitaxe GT 97% better weight (0.4 vs 12.0 kg)
  • Whatsminer M30S++ 4529% more heat output (256 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe GT 78% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitaxe GT Metric Whatsminer M30S++
$499 Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,300
-$0.04 Daily net profit -$5.09
-$512 Net after 1 year -$4,158
-$525 Net after 2 years -$6,016
-$538 Net after 3 years -$7,873
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe GT

Score: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe GT

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitaxe GT or Whatsminer M30S++ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $-0.04/day compared to $-5.09/day for the Whatsminer M30S++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitaxe GT or Whatsminer M30S++?

The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Whatsminer M30S++ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitaxe GT vs Whatsminer M30S++: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M30S++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitaxe GT and Whatsminer M30S++?

The Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 16.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficacité (15.0 vs 31.0 J/TH).