Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 137.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 126.0 TH/s |
| 3 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 18.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 9 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Intel | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) et le Whatsminer M50S sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and Whatsminer M50S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M50S 91871% more hashrate (0.1 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (2.5 vs 3,276.0 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 30% better efficacité (18.3 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S 131402% more heat output (8.5 vs 11,177.7 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$0.00 | Daily net profit | -$4.21 |
| -$1 | Net after 1 year | -$4,738 |
| -$1 | Net after 2 years | -$6,276 |
| -$2 | Net after 3 years | -$7,815 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or Whatsminer M50S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-4.21/day for the Whatsminer M50S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or the Whatsminer M50S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Whatsminer M50S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and Whatsminer M50S?
The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 7.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficacité (18.3 vs 26.0 J/TH).