Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 3.3 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $76,855 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) wins on 5 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 650 J/TH) in the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)'s favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 270170% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 82% better power draw (360.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 650 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 29% better weight (2.3 vs 3.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 454% more heat output (1,228 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 3% more home mining score (69.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $89 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$200 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$256 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-0.86/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)?
The Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 69/100 for the Goldshell AE-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,079.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 650 J/TH).