Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 3.3 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 650 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 185085% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 88% better power draw (530.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 650 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 9% better weight (3.0 vs 3.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 715% more heat output (1,808 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 9% more home mining score (65.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $89 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$200 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$256 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)?
The Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Goldshell AE-BOX II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,164.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 650 J/TH).