Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 3.3 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $76,855 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) wins on 6 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 650 J/TH) in the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)'s favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 27678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 98% better power draw (3,300.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 650 J/TH)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 76% better weight (13.5 vs 3.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 4976% more heat output (11,260 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 42% more home mining score (50.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $89 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$200 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$256 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)?
The Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s): which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,016.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 650 J/TH).