Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 3.3 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s), which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 650 J/TH) in the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)'s favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 18419% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 98% better power draw (3,200.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 650 J/TH)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 74% better weight (12.5 vs 3.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4823% more heat output (10,918 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 145% more home mining score (29.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $89 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$200 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$256 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)?
The Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,275.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 650 J/TH).