Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell AE Card

Goldshell AE Card

Hashrate 5.5 MH/s Power 65 W Efficiency 11,818,181.8 J/TH
VS
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)

Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)

Hashrate 100.0 GH/s Power 65 W Efficiency 650.0 J/TH

Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell AE Card Specification Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
5.5 MH/s Hashrate 100.0 GH/s
65 W Power Consumption 65 W
11,818,181.8 J/TH Efficiency 650.0 J/TH
35 dB Noise Level 35 dB
0.3 kg Weight 3.3 kg
222 BTU/hr BTU Output 222 BTU/hr
71/100 Home Mining Score 71/100
Release Year
Zksnark Algorithm Sha3x
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell AE Card

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.16
Monthly -$4.68
Yearly -$56.94

Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)

Daily Revenue 0.00000005 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.15
Monthly -$4.57
Yearly -$55.65

Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 3 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 650 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) — wins on 3 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 1818082% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 650 J/TH)
  • Goldshell AE Card 90% better weight (0.3 vs 3.3 kg)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell AE Card Metric Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $89
-$0.16 Daily net profit -$0.15
-$156 Net after 1 year -$145
-$213 Net after 2 years -$200
-$270 Net after 3 years -$256
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)

650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-0.16/day for the Goldshell AE Card. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s): how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,531.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 650 J/TH).