Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer DR3

Bitmain Antminer DR3

Hashrate 7.8 TH/s Power 1,410 W Efficiency 180.8 J/TH
VS
Antminer KS3

Antminer KS3

Hashrate 9.4 TH/s Power 3,500 W Efficiency 372.3 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer DR3 vs Antminer KS3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer DR3 Specification Antminer KS3
7.8 TH/s Hashrate 9.4 TH/s
1,410 W Power Consumption 3,500 W
180.8 J/TH Efficiency 372.3 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
4,200.0 kg Weight 16.1 kg
4,811 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,942 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer DR3

Daily Revenue 0.00000359 BTC $0.28
Daily Electricity -$3.38
Daily Profit -$3.11
Monthly -$93.25
Yearly -$1,134.51

Antminer KS3

Daily Revenue 0.00000433 BTC $0.33
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit -$8.07
Monthly -$242.03
Yearly -$2,944.70

Based on BTC price of $76,826 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Both the Bitmain Antminer DR3 and Antminer KS3 are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer DR3 and Antminer KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer KS3 21% more hashrate (7.8 vs 9.4 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer DR3 60% better power draw (1,410 vs 3,500 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer DR3 51% better efficiency (181 vs 372 J/TH)
  • Antminer KS3 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 16.1 kg)
  • Antminer KS3 148% more heat output (4,811 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer KS3 16% more home mining score (31.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitmain Antminer DR3 Metric Antminer KS3
Upfront cost (MSRP) $8,000
-$3.11 Daily net profit -$8.07
-$1,135 Net after 1 year -$10,945
-$2,269 Net after 2 years -$13,889
-$3,404 Net after 3 years -$16,834
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer KS3

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer DR3

180.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer DR3 or the Antminer KS3?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer DR3 is more profitable at $-3.11/day compared to $-8.07/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer DR3 or Antminer KS3?

The Antminer KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer DR3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitmain Antminer DR3 vs Antminer KS3: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer DR3 and Antminer KS3 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer DR3 runs at 180.8 J/TH while the Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH — a difference of 191.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficiency (181 vs 372 J/TH).