Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer AL1

Antminer AL1

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 210.0 J/TH
VS
Bitmain Antminer DR3

Bitmain Antminer DR3

Hashrate 7.8 TH/s Power 1,410 W Efficiency 180.8 J/TH

Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer DR3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer AL1 Specification Bitmain Antminer DR3
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 7.8 TH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 1,410 W
210.0 J/TH Efficiency 180.8 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
14.5 kg Weight 4,200.0 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,811 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Blake3 Algorithm Blake256r14
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer AL1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.57
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$7.50
Monthly -$224.93
Yearly -$2,736.67

Bitmain Antminer DR3

Daily Revenue 0.00000359 BTC $0.28
Daily Electricity -$3.38
Daily Profit -$3.11
Monthly -$93.24
Yearly -$1,134.40

Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Both the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer DR3 are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.

Spec Deltas

The Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer DR3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer AL1 105% more hashrate (16.0 vs 7.8 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer DR3 58% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,410 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer DR3 14% better efficiency (210 vs 181 J/TH)
  • Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 4,200.0 kg)
  • Antminer AL1 138% more heat output (11,464 vs 4,811 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer AL1 16% more home mining score (36.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer AL1 Metric Bitmain Antminer DR3
$10,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.50 Daily net profit -$3.11
-$12,737 Net after 1 year -$1,134
-$15,473 Net after 2 years -$2,269
-$18,210 Net after 3 years -$3,403
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer AL1

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer DR3

180.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer DR3 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer DR3 is more profitable at $-3.11/day compared to $-7.50/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer DR3: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer DR3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer DR3?

The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer DR3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer DR3 runs at 180.8 J/TH — a difference of 29.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficiency (210 vs 181 J/TH).