Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS BOX II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Specification | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 460.0 GH/s |
| 2,079 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 231.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 869.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16,100.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 7,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b+sha3 | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer HS3
Goldshell HS BOX II
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer HS3 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1857% more hashrate (9.0 vs 0.5 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer HS3's favour. The Goldshell HS BOX II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer HS3 and Goldshell HS BOX II actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 1857% more hashrate (9.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 81% better power draw (2,079 vs 400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 73% better efficiency (231 vs 870 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 100% better weight (16,100.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 420% more heat output (7,094 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 31% more home mining score (26.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Metric | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| $900 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $325 |
| -$4.67 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$2,605 | Net after 1 year | -$670 |
| -$4,310 | Net after 2 years | -$1,014 |
| -$6,014 | Net after 3 years | -$1,359 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS BOX IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer HS3231.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS BOX II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS BOX II is more profitable at $-0.94/day compared to $-4.67/day for the Bitmain Antminer HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or the Goldshell HS BOX II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or Goldshell HS BOX II?
The Goldshell HS BOX II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS BOX II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 runs at 231.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS BOX II runs at 869.6 J/TH — a difference of 638.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficiency (231 vs 870 J/TH).