Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Specification | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 105.0 GH/s |
| 2,079 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| 231.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,095.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16,100.0 kg | Weight | 450.0 kg |
| 7,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 392 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b+sha3 | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer HS3
Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 8471% more hashrate (9.0 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer HS3's favour. That said, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer HS3 and Goldshell HS1-PLUS sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 8471% more hashrate (9.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 94% better power draw (2,079 vs 115 W)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 79% better efficiency (231 vs 1,095 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 97% better weight (16,100 vs 450 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 1708% more heat output (7,094 vs 392 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 15% more home mining score (26.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Metric | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| $900 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $900 |
| -$4.67 | Daily net profit | -$0.27 |
| -$2,605 | Net after 1 year | -$999 |
| -$4,310 | Net after 2 years | -$1,099 |
| -$6,014 | Net after 3 years | -$1,198 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS1-PLUSScore: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer HS3231.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or the Goldshell HS1-PLUS?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS is more profitable at $-0.27/day compared to $-4.67/day for the Bitmain Antminer HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or the Goldshell HS1-PLUS better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or Goldshell HS1-PLUS?
The Goldshell HS1-PLUS scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer HS3 and Goldshell HS1-PLUS on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 runs at 231.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS1-PLUS runs at 1,095.2 J/TH — a difference of 864.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (231 vs 1,095 J/TH).