Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Specification | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.3 TH/s |
| 2,079 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 231.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 755.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16,100.0 kg | Weight | 8.5 kg |
| 7,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b+sha3 | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer HS3
Goldshell HS6
Based on BTC price of $76,989 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 69% better efficiency (231 vs 756 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer HS3's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer HS3 and Goldshell HS6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 109% more hashrate (9.0 vs 4.3 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 36% better power draw (2,079 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 69% better efficiency (231 vs 756 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 100% better weight (16,100.0 vs 8.5 kg)
- Goldshell HS6 56% more heat output (7,094 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 18% more home mining score (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Metric | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| $900 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,100 |
| -$4.67 | Daily net profit | -$7.65 |
| -$2,605 | Net after 1 year | -$5,891 |
| -$4,310 | Net after 2 years | -$8,683 |
| -$6,014 | Net after 3 years | -$11,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer HS3Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer HS3231.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or the Goldshell HS6?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 is more profitable at $-4.67/day compared to $-7.65/day for the Goldshell HS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or Goldshell HS6?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer HS3 and Goldshell HS6?
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 runs at 231.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 runs at 755.8 J/TH — a difference of 524.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (231 vs 756 J/TH).