Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 2,000 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Hashrate 52.0 TH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 53.9 J/TH

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)	Specification	Innosilicon T3+ 52T
50.0 TH/s	Hashrate	52.0 TH/s
2,000 W	Power Consumption	2,800 W
40.0 J/TH	Efficiency	53.9 J/TH
70 dB	Noise Level	—
7.5 kg	Weight	10,000.0 kg
6,824 BTU/hr	BTU Output	9,554 BTU/hr
42/100	Home Mining Score	22/100
—	Release Year	—
SHA-256	Algorithm	SHA-256
D-Central	Manufacturer	Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.82

Daily Electricity -$4.80

Daily Profit -$2.98

Monthly -$89.28

Yearly -$1,086.25

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Daily Revenue 0.00002393 BTC $1.90

Daily Electricity -$6.72

Daily Profit -$4.82

Monthly -$144.69

Yearly -$1,760.43

Based on BTC price of $79,271 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 29% better power draw (2,000 vs 2,800 W). That said, the Innosilicon T3+ 52T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Antminer Slim Edition (S17) — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Innosilicon T3+ 52T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

Innosilicon T3+ 52T 4% more hashrate (50.0 vs 52.0 TH/s)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 29% better power draw (2,000 vs 2,800 W)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 26% better efficiency (40.0 vs 53.9 J/TH)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 100% better weight (7.5 vs 10,000.0 kg)
Innosilicon T3+ 52T 40% more heat output (6,824 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 91% more home mining score (42.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)	Metric	Innosilicon T3+ 52T
$600	Upfront cost (MSRP)	—
-$2.98	Daily net profit	-$4.82
-$1,686	Net after 1 year	-$1,760
-$2,773	Net after 2 years	-$3,521
-$3,859	Net after 3 years	-$5,281
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)	Payback period	—

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Score: 42/100. 70 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) is more profitable at $-2.98/day compared to $-4.82/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 13.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficiency (40.0 vs 53.9 J/TH).

Compare Antminer Slim Edition (S17) with...

Compare Innosilicon T3+ 52T with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.