Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Hashrate 375.0 TH/s Power 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M60

Whatsminer M60

Hashrate 170.0 TH/s Power 3,383 W Efficiency 19.9 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Whatsminer M60

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Specification Whatsminer M60
375.0 TH/s Hashrate 170.0 TH/s
5,625 W Power Consumption 3,383 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 19.9 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level 75 dB
Weight 13.5 kg
19,193 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,543 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00017257 BTC $13.45
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$0.05
Monthly -$1.54
Yearly -$18.75

Whatsminer M60

Daily Revenue 0.00007823 BTC $6.10
Daily Electricity -$8.12
Daily Profit -$2.02
Monthly -$60.67
Yearly -$738.21

Based on BTC price of $77,932 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Auradine Teraflux AI3680, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 121% more hashrate (375 vs 170 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AI3680's favour. The Whatsminer M60 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Whatsminer M60 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 121% more hashrate (375 vs 170 TH/s)
  • Whatsminer M60 40% better power draw (5,625 vs 3,383 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 25% better efficiency (15.0 vs 19.9 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 66% more heat output (19,193 vs 11,543 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Metric Whatsminer M60
Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,800
-$0.05 Daily net profit -$2.02
-$19 Net after 1 year -$5,538
-$38 Net after 2 years -$6,276
-$56 Net after 3 years -$7,015
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M60

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Whatsminer M60 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-0.05/day compared to $-2.02/day for the Whatsminer M60. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Whatsminer M60: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Whatsminer M60 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Whatsminer M60: which fits a residential setup better?

The Whatsminer M60 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Whatsminer M60: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 4.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (15.0 vs 19.9 J/TH).